Prepared for

You bid the equipment number. How long before you know whether it was right?

Labor comes back daily, coded to the activity, so the next estimate is sharper than the last one. Equipment does not. It goes into the bid as an allowance, then a machine sits on that job for months, accruing cost that arrives as a period total spread by a rule. Nobody can point at a structure and say what the machine on it actually cost. So the same allowance goes into the next bid.

ENR named Burns & McDonnell its Texas and Louisiana Design Firm of the Year in June 2026, on record regional revenue above one billion dollars. New EPC leadership arrived this year to expand into LNG, mining, and critical minerals. Three sectors where nobody at the firm has an equipment actual to bid from yet.Pricing a new sector is hard enough. Pricing it without equipment actuals from the last one is harder.

Turner, Mortenson, and Swinerton run their equipment operations on RentalResult.

See where Burns & McDonnell stands

5 minutes, results on screen immediately. No cost, no demo, no follow-up sequence.

Five reasons the equipment number
never comes back.

None of these is anyone estimating badly. Each one is a reason the cost that comes back cannot be used to sharpen the number that goes out.

  1. You bid a number per unit. What comes back is one total. The estimate carries an equipment allowance per structure or per mile. The actual arrives as a period cost spread across the whole job. Neither is wrong, and neither can be laid against the other.

  2. The rate charging the job is not the rate you priced. Estimates assume a duration. If the system only holds one flat rate, work priced monthly gets charged daily, or the reverse. The variance then describes the rate structure rather than how the crew performed.

  3. You cannot tell whether owning it beat renting it. Third-party rental shows up as an invoice. Owned equipment shows up as whatever internal rate got applied. Putting the two side by side on the same scope of work takes a project, so mostly nobody does.

  4. Nobody charges downtime to the machine that caused it. A unit fails, a crew stands, the schedule takes the hit. Those hours land on the job but never against the asset, so the machine still reads as though it performed.

  5. The cost arrives after the next bid is submitted. A figure that lands at close on a job that is still running is history. The estimate that could have used it went out before it existed.

Four things that decide whether the number comes back.

These are the four capabilities that turn equipment cost into something an estimator can use. Every one of them is ordinary in a rental system and unusual in a tracking system.

The question Across a stack of tools On one system
  1. The agreementIs the machine on a rental agreement, or just a transfer?

    A movement record. The machine is somewhere, and that is all the record says.

    A rental agreement per unit with a job, a start, an expected end, and a rate on it.

  2. The rateCan you charge the way the work was priced?

    One flat rate, with negotiated project rates and any caps tracked outside the system that invoices.

    Daily, weekly, monthly, and project-negotiated rates, with maximum caps applied automatically.

  3. The codingDoes the cost reach the code the estimate came from?

    Applied downstream by someone who was not in the transaction, against a code chosen after the fact.

    Cost code and work breakdown structure captured at the transaction and passed to your ERP.

  4. The detailCan you see cost per machine, per job?

    A job total that reconciles, with nothing underneath it to explain a number that missed.

    Cost per asset, per job, per code, with downtime charged against the unit that caused it.

Get those four right and the equipment number in a bid sharpens itself, job after job. Get them wrong and the allowance you use in 2027 is the one you were using in 2022.

Labor tells you what it cost. Equipment tells you eventually, and roughly.

Changing that needs three things a tracking tool does not do. Put every machine on a rental agreement against a job, with a rate and an expected end date. Charge on the same basis the work was priced. And send the cost to the code the estimate came from.

It compounds as the firm grows. Rates built from your own completed work travel. They move between offices, and they give a team pricing LNG or mining a starting point drawn from jobs Burns & McDonnell has already built, rather than an allowance somebody had to guess at.

Start the 5-minute scorecard

The four areas the scorecard measures.

The scorecard returns a separate result for each of the four areas. That is where the output gets useful. Strong on visibility and thin on cost control is a common combination, and it points to a very different priority than one overall number would.

Fleet Visibility Across Jobs

Can every job, yard, and branch work from the same current picture of the fleet?

Visibility is the foundation the other three areas sit on. When the asset register and the ground disagree, every decision downstream inherits the error. Real-time visibility across the entire fleet lets equipment managers, warehouse staff, and field crews focus on high-impact work instead of chasing status.

Common signs of strain:

  • Teams call or message the yard to find out what is available.
  • The same asset exists in two systems with two different statuses.
  • Buy, transfer, or rent gets decided one order at a time, by judgment.
  • Asset numbers are keyed in by hand rather than scanned.
Score Burns & McDonnell across all four

10 questions. 5 minutes. Results on screen.

Tracking a machine and costing a machine are different jobs.

Most equipment platforms were built to answer one question: where is it. Tag systems, tool trackers, and telematics all do that well, and a contractor without one is worse off. But knowing where a machine is does not put it on a rental agreement to a job, does not apply the rate the work was bid at, and does not send a cost to the code the estimate came from.

That is a rental and job costing system, not a tracking system. It is why contractors frequently end up running both, and why the cost still lands late. Tracking answers where the machine is. Only a costed rental against a cost code answers what it cost the job.

The scorecard is a way to find where the gap sits today, across visibility, utilization, readiness, and cost control, without a sales conversation attached.

How would Burns & McDonnell score today?

Ten questions, five minutes, and a benchmarked result across visibility, utilization, readiness, and cost control. Worth running alongside someone from the equipment group and comparing answers. No cost and no demo attached.

Start the 5-minute assessment

What the Scorecard Covers

Ten practical questions about how the equipment operation runs today. In five minutes it shows which of the four areas deserves attention first, and how that compares with contractors running self-perform crews at similar scale.

  • Takes5 minutes, 10 questions
  • Built forConstruction operations, equipment and fleet, project controls, finance, and IT
  • You getYour score and the full breakdown, on screen, right away
  • CostsNothing. No demo, no pitch, results are yours

Start the scorecard

What it takes to get the number back.

The scorecard is vendor neutral and costs nothing. RentalResult is what we build, and this is the job it does. It rents your own equipment to your own jobs: every machine on an agreement, at a rate, against a cost code, with the cost reaching your ERP. Contractors on the platform eliminate up to 75% of manual equipment tasks, and clients have increased equipment revenue by 20% renting idle units externally.

The four things a tracking tool does not do:

  • Agreements, not transfers. Every machine goes onto a job with a start, an expected end, a rate, and a cost code behind it
  • Cost where the estimate lives. Cost codes and work breakdown structure captured at the transaction, integrated with SAP, CMiC, Oracle, and Vista Viewpoint
  • Variance you can trace. Cost per asset, per job, per code, so a number that missed can be explained rather than absorbed
  • Rates that match the bid. Daily, weekly, monthly, and project-negotiated rates with maximum caps enforced automatically at invoice
  • And the rest of it: utilization by class and branch, service against runtime, total cost of ownership per asset, and idle units rented out between projects

See where Burns & McDonnell stands across all four areas.

Ten questions, five minutes, and a benchmarked view of how well equipment cost reaches the people writing the next bid. No cost and no obligation attached.

Start the 5-minute scorecard

No demo required. The results are built to be shared internally, and they work as a starting point across construction, the equipment group, and project controls.

RentalResult by Wynne Systems
Prepared for Burns & McDonnell
Scroll to Top
Secret Link